Possible edit of Chinese and Russian regions in Atwar World Map
Objave: 34
Posjećeno od: 109 users
Question asked here is not understandable for most players therefore i give up and end the conversation.
China and Russia recently had military reforms which included reorganization, resizing and reducing military districts[regions]. I bring this up because our current world map in Atwar is based on military districts in Russia and China [while all others are based on national borders except USA and Brazil].
OLD REGIONS (jinan and nanjing are merged in atwar, you already know that)
Volga and Ural regions separated in atwar
NEW REGIONS
As you can see, China reduced its regions from 6 to 5, while Russia reduced from 7 to 4. Do you think this can be playable in Atwar gamestyle? My opinion is positive.
Pros: more cities in the region, more income, larger bonus, more troops during reinf
Cons: if regional capital is captured you are unable to use all cities in the region for reinf, income plummet
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theater_commands_of_the_People%27s_Liberation_Army
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Russian_military_reform
If self-called 'competitive' players want to play competitive clan wars go make custom map, that's what it is for. Standard map reflect contemporary World.
P.S.
Also maybe add Crimea as part of Russia: South (just like Kalinigrad is part of Russia: Northwest). Latest changes were flag update for Libya and South Sudan added, while its been 2 years for Crimea change.
China and Russia recently had military reforms which included reorganization, resizing and reducing military districts[regions]. I bring this up because our current world map in Atwar is based on military districts in Russia and China [while all others are based on national borders except USA and Brazil].
OLD REGIONS (jinan and nanjing are merged in atwar, you already know that)
Volga and Ural regions separated in atwar
NEW REGIONS
As you can see, China reduced its regions from 6 to 5, while Russia reduced from 7 to 4. Do you think this can be playable in Atwar gamestyle? My opinion is positive.
Pros: more cities in the region, more income, larger bonus, more troops during reinf
Cons: if regional capital is captured you are unable to use all cities in the region for reinf, income plummet
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theater_commands_of_the_People%27s_Liberation_Army
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Russian_military_reform
If self-called 'competitive' players want to play competitive clan wars go make custom map, that's what it is for. Standard map reflect contemporary World.
P.S.
Also maybe add Crimea as part of Russia: South (just like Kalinigrad is part of Russia: Northwest). Latest changes were flag update for Libya and South Sudan added, while its been 2 years for Crimea change.
At the end it's all up to admins to decide what to do with their game. This is just one of the many many times in atWar history where admins elected the rest of the game over 'competitive' Eu  Though I hardly doubt this happens with the current situation with the map editor...
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
|
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
|
From a pragmatic perspective, I'd just like to note that the modern world changes very, very quickly. It's absurd to think that the developers can keep up with every significant change in the state of the world by changing the map.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
ya, just 20% of players left the game after html update, that's the adaption, and all the new comers that were coming after html like it was predicted, are just gone, and it was the main argument from people like you who were supporting admins that time, i don't know anyone from that period of time....
----   
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
- 1
- 2
