|
i think scenario cws should be an option but... ww1 or 2 cw is unlikely to happen anytime soon. theres been 1 10 v 10 cw in the history of aw.
Ultimate WW2 requires 19 players.
The War to end all Wars requires 11 players.
Endsieg requires 8 players.
As you can see not all of them requires 20 players
Also, SM's 500th anniversary isn't the only 10vs10 CW in atWar history. I remember evoL doing the same.
i didnt say they did. And yea evol was the clan who played against them.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
CW we get Turk-Ukr, or UKR-UK-Germ combo.
the picking order(theoretically) prevents those combos. I say theoretically, most ppl just dont pick them.
i think scenario cws should be an option but... ww1 or 2 cw is unlikely to happen anytime soon. theres been 1 10 v 10 cw in the history of aw. even 5v5s are rare. Most scenarios are either too big or require too many players. Cws on them will be super rare unless suddenly there are more clans and players.
First Coalition needs 7, Second Coalition 10, Spartacus 8... there are really a lot of them that need ~10. Also, most scenario players are focused in just 3 coalitions (Optimates, Hydra and Epic Clan), which means it'd be easier to fill a CW.
----
Someone Better Than You
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Total support with the idea, if that happen, i should retrain the ancient and the GoT scenarios we have.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
I have spoken with Ivan about this before l, his main concern is players complaining about balance etc.
My rebuttal is that players will choose not to play on an unbalanced map.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|