Nabavi Premium da sakriješ reklame
Objave: 8   Posjećeno od: 55 users
13.10.2019 - 18:50
I have a solution to all worldly conflicts:

Take the surface area of all of Earth's land and divide it by 7.5 billion.
Then everyone on Earth will have an equal amount of land to farm and provide for him/her self.
Then the world will be at peace.
----
Happiness = reality - expectations
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
14.10.2019 - 11:12
Yes but who gets what part? Some are better and some are worse.
----
Someone Better Than You
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
14.10.2019 - 11:49
Napisao Zephyrusu, 14.10.2019 at 11:12

Yes but who gets what part? Some are better and some are worse.


Jews are growing orchards in the desert, so soil is not a problem.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
14.10.2019 - 14:40
 Alex
Xmm i smell communism
----
Orcs are a horde, much like Turks. Elves and Men are light skinned, Orcs are often darker/sallow skinned, like Turks.

Istanbul?Thats not how you pronounce Constantinople
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
14.10.2019 - 16:59
Napisao Full House, 14.10.2019 at 11:57

No we should not give all equal amount of lands.
We should give the lands to those who are professional farmers.
This will free others who can follow a different profession.
We will profit from more professional farming and other professions like that.


How the worlds' been set up since the start of civilization
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
14.10.2019 - 17:48
Napisao Full House, 14.10.2019 at 11:57

No we should not give all equal amount of lands.
We should give the lands to those who are professional farmers.
This will free others who can follow a different profession.
We will profit from more professional farming and other professions like that.


So non-farmers will be unemployed and with more free time, which then most of them will use to start wars of conquest and invent hate & lies to maintain the war machine. Good logic.

Also aren't farms sustainable? Non-farmers must create factories to sustain their life, then they need more space for industry, and more resources for their machines, so they push out farmers and waste resources which are not renewable like oil, iron and coal, polluting the living space in the process.

80% of population were farmers from 2500BC to 1800AD, no pollution no climate change, that's 4300 years of sustainable life. Then comes industry 1800AD to 2000AD, and we are already ruining our living space, life is not sustainable anymore. And it's been only 200 years, now compare this to 4300 years. 4.6% mate.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
15.10.2019 - 08:41
It will probably take 5 years t
For the smarter and richer to buy out all the dimwits
In 10-15 years you will end up exactly where you started....what am i saying you will end up much worse
With the rich actually owning the planet.
----



Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
15.10.2019 - 09:47
Napisao Full House, 15.10.2019 at 06:03

Free Time = War
interesting thesis
in this simulation the farmers would provide for non-farmers who in return will offer other service (like police which will investigate sean´s death)
I think pollution is not necessarily consequence of factories since we can nowadays use green energy.
But sure I woud recommend that society is more frugal and not wastes so much ressources like today.


But again; we must be realistic, gren energy can't provide us with the energy consumption we need/want (industry, housing, transportation, military), but do you know what can that can energy provide? Farms, the irony right?. Theres a documentary showing how Serbia is building 800 mini-dams to provide 2% of energy, while draining 800 small rivers and destroying river's ecosystem (fish and plants dying in it), while China is lacking space so they are building solar panels on top of the lakes and sea, thus creating dark inside and not allowed sea life to get any sunlight. So green energy is not really green.

So why do we need industry if we are high IQ beings and we see it is destroying our environment? We have examples where we were perfectly fine with pre-industrial life, such as during Napoleon Era for example: we used basic resourcse (wood, stone and iron) and we still had long-range guns, firepower, transportation, housing, heating, lighting, clothing (maybe the best fashion ever), even medicine and health food, and no pollution. Our forests and rivers had more life in it as well.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Privatnost | Uvjeti korištenja | Natpisi | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Pridruži nam se na

Proširite riječ