Description: This tournament will be a ladder tournament that will last for the length of the current coalition season(3 months). The ladder will consist of ten participants ranking from 1-10. To move up in the ladder, you simply have to beat the person currently ranked ahead of you on the ladder in a 1v1 match. A victory results in you moving up one spot and a loss results in your dropping one spot. If you are not in the Top 10 of the ladder, you must beat the #10 ranked person to take their place on the ladder. The first ten ladder participants will be determined by the first ten players who win a 1v1 match and provide a SS here.
Rules: Any refusal to play a match in the tournament will result in an automatic loss to whomever challenged you. I don't care what the excuse is. It WILL BE A LOSS. For that matter, anyone who does not reply to another player's request to play will be considered a refusal to play and will also count as a loss. I know this sounds unfair, but I am letting everyone know ahead of time. My suggestion is that if you do not have enough time to play a match, do not get on AW because challenges will likely come as soon as you log on(especially if you are in 10th place). With that said, the exception to this rule is that you are allowed to refuse the opportunity for someone to play you if you have already played them that day. As for the settings for the match, the matches must be 1v1 in which you capture the other player's capital. Other than those two rules, you are allowed to play on any map, with any funds, with any other settings you like. All rules and victories will be enforced through screenshots, so DO NOT FORGET TO PROVIDE SCREENSHOTS.
Awards:
King of the Ladder(Trophy Awarded to Number One Ranked Player at Season's End)
Slayer(Trophy Awarded to Player Who Defeated Number One Ranked Player the Most)
50 ProtoCoins of my very own donation will also be given to all participants who finish in the Top 10
Slayer Leaderboard:
1) Meester/Skenderbeu/Clovis1122/Khalessi/Waffel: One Point
P.S. If this turns out to be a popular tournament, I have considered starting Coalition and Tag Ladders as well in future seasons. Hope everyone has fun! Cheers!
Update #1: Upon further consideration, I have decided to limit the number of challenges to 1 challenge per person per day and the tenth ranked player will have to play no more than 2 matches a day to defend his spot.
Update #2: Screenshots must now also include the time and date within the screenshot so I may easier pull up the game in the game logs to verify. Therefore, do not embed the SS. Simply post a hyperlink to it. Also, a player will not be moved down for not playing on the first challenge(assuming he has good reason). Rather, a person will not lose a position until he has failed to play three consecutive challenges. Once again, screenshots with dates/times are required.
Update #3: Due to popular decision, the challenger decides the rules of the match if rules cannot be agreed upon mutually. Due to this already causing problems, I have decided to return to what I originally said. The two players should come to terms on an agreement for maps and rules. If it is not possible to reach an agreement, the game will be played in a Eu+ Map with 10k funds and 4 minute turns.
Update #4: You will not receive a point on the Slayer Leaderboard for beating the person who took 1st place from you.
Yeah i went afk ... But 1 challenge per day agains 1 person ... You will challenge me tomorrow to retake the place ;) Im not avoiding you
Um yea ...1 challenge per day. So can i use my challenge against someone?
Yes. You can. You could technically re-challenge Skend back. But after that, you two would have to wait a day.
so 2 challenges agains 1 person? and anoher question ... i cant challenge meester now cos i used my challenge? and none can challenge goblin cos he already got challenged? And how do people know that The ranked down player didnt use yet his challenge? Explain this rules and write them
And The person that challenge you , decide rules? Write these in rules
That is not a rule though. You two decide the rules together, and if you cannot agree on rules, you play default duel settings as accepted by majority of AW(Eu+ 10k Extra Cities).
---- "In atWar you either die a hero or live long enough to ally fag and gang bang some poor bastards."
~Goblin
One last question
Do you need to beat just the person above you, or anyone above you ? eg
3. sken 4. goblin 5. me. But if I beat skend he drops one place and I move up one place so 3 of us will be 4th place only.
People seem to think they can only challenge person who is directly above them ...NO, you can challenge anyone who is above you.
For example ...if you are 10th you can still challenge 1st player on board.
If you win you will go one place up and be 9th ...1st player will fall to 2nd.
People seem to think they can only challenge person who is directly above them ...NO, you can challenge anyone who is above you.
For example ...if you are 10th you can still challenge 1st player on board.
If you win you will go one place up and be 9th ...1st player will fall to 2nd.
Wtf? really? thats stupid
WTF! why is it stupid? ...OMG you all dumbasses thought you need to challenge the next guy??? xD buahahaha
One last question
Do you need to beat just the person above you, or anyone above you ? eg
3. sken 4. goblin 5. me. But if I beat skend he drops one place and I move up one place so 3 of us will be 4th place only.
Look his example ... 3 players in 4th place ... it cant be applied
im pretty sure Spart means the rules to challenge the person above ... and climb
Look his example ... 3 players in 4th place ... it cant be applied
im pretty sure Spart means the rules to challenge the person above ... and climb
Good point ...but then again, tomorow for example i challenge skender and beat him, clovis cant challenge skender because i already challenged him.
Next day skender challenges me and win ...now clovis cant challenge me because skender already did. Me and skender could go like this back and forth and clovis wouldnt have a chance at challenging us.... meanwhile he would have to defend his position all this time.
xD ...this tourney is fucked.
This is why at the start i tried to propose that people can be:
• at the same position, number, whatever you call it
• can challenge anyone that is on the same position and above them
example:
1) Meester
2) Clovis
3) Skender, Goblin
4) Minus seven
Why would anyone mind this? ...you could never have 2 people in number 1 position.
Again disagree
Lets say we are :
1Meester
2clovis
3 me
4 goblin
u challenge me and win ... u used ur daily challenge to me ... but u can still challenge to clovis cos u still didnt challenge him , if u lose to him , i can challenge you cos i didnt challenge u for the day ... if i win i can challenge clovis cos i still didnt challenge him .... if i win i can challenge meester cos i still didnt ... but u can t challenge clovis co u already did . and clovis can challenge me cos he didnt challenge me for the day yet
u challenge me and win ... u used ur daily challenge to me ... but u can still challenge to clovis cos u still didnt challenge him , if u lose to him , i can challenge you cos i didnt challenge u for the day ... if i win i can challenge clovis cos i still didnt challenge him .... if i win i can challenge meester cos i still didnt ... but u can t challenge clovis co u already did . and clovis can challenge me cos he didnt challenge me for the day yet
u challenge me and win ... u used ur daily challenge to me ... but u can still challenge to clovis cos u still didnt challenge him , if u lose to him , i can challenge you cos i didnt challenge u for the day ... if i win i can challenge clovis cos i still didnt challenge him .... if i win i can challenge meester cos i still didnt ... but u can t challenge clovis co u already did . and clovis can challenge me cos he didnt challenge me for the day yet
WTF? so basicly what you are saying is ...you can be 10th and then in one day challenge everyone 1 by 1 all the way to number 1?
Its 1 challenge per day ...not per person. ...jesus if this is 1 challenge per person ...i will chill till its 1 week until the end of season and just move my way up in last week ok.
Realized there is a problem with both mine, sparts and ...lol skenders idea.
Skender ...your is the funniest. serioulsy i will be back in this tourney in 2 months if you are correct. I doubt you are ...because that would mean holy shit number of games played.
Spart pls explain ...is it 1 challenge per day or 1 challenge per day against every single player on board.
Realized there is a problem with both mine, sparts and ...lol skenders idea.
Skender ...your is the funniest. serioulsy i will be back in this tourney in 2 months if you are correct.
You first will be kicked cos inactivity ... and if u try to climb it in one week , good luck on not losig to opponents u challenge (for this rule of challenger decide rules should be romoved) or to who challenge u under your spot , its fair and if u do u deserve first place
Realized there is a problem with both mine, sparts and ...lol skenders idea.
Skender ...your is the funniest. serioulsy i will be back in this tourney in 2 months if you are correct.
You first will be kicked cos inactivity ... and if u try to climb it in one week , good luck on not losig to opponents u challenge (for this rule of challenger decide rules should be romoved) or to who challenge u under your spot , its fair and if u do u deserve first place
What em i suppose to give my life for this tourney? ...expecting possibly few challenges a day for 100 days? ...u mad?
Realized there is a problem with both mine, sparts and ...lol skenders idea.
Skender ...your is the funniest. serioulsy i will be back in this tourney in 2 months if you are correct.
You first will be kicked cos inactivity ... and if u try to climb it in one week , good luck on not losig to opponents u challenge (for this rule of challenger decide rules should be romoved) or to who challenge u under your spot , its fair and if u do u deserve first place
What em i suppose to give my life for this tourney? ...expecting possibly few challenges a day for 100 days? ...u mad?
Sorry guys. I seem to not have explained things well. So I will try to re-explain the two things that seem to be giving the most problems:
1) You can only challenge the person 1 spot ahead of you in the rankings.
2) You can challenge the same person only one time per day. If you win, you are allowed to challenge and continue to move up the ladder for that day. Essentially though, a loss will stop your progression for that day.
Does that make sense now? If not, please let me know.
---- "In atWar you either die a hero or live long enough to ally fag and gang bang some poor bastards."
~Goblin
1 challenge per day because I do not want people getting challenged over and over again by the same person on the same day.
Does that make sense now? If not, please let me know.
Lol if i challenge 1 time the peron above me and i lose i will not challenge him ''over and over again''.... but if i win the player reabove should be obligated to challenge me i think.
People that make consecutive wins should be awarded in my opinion. and not the player sitting there hoping thr person under him lose to his person under
1 challenge per day because I do not want people getting challenged over and over again by the same person on the same day.
Does that make sense now? If not, please let me know.
Lol if i challenge 1 time the peron above me and i lose i will not challenge him ''over and over again''.... but if i win the player reabove should be obligated to challenge me i think.
People that make consecutive wins should be awarded in my opinion. and not the player sitting there hoping thr person above him lose to hi person above.
If that was the case though, then in theory, someone could wait until the final day of the league to play and go from outside the ladder all the way to first which is not fair to the other players who played all season. Also, I did not mean you specifically would challenge someone over and over. I just used you as an example. You may not but there are plenty of players who would.
---- "In atWar you either die a hero or live long enough to ally fag and gang bang some poor bastards."
~Goblin
1 challenge per day because I do not want people getting challenged over and over again by the same person on the same day.
Does that make sense now? If not, please let me know.
Lol if i challenge 1 time the peron above me and i lose i will not challenge him ''over and over again''.... but if i win the player reabove should be obligated to challenge me i think.
People that make consecutive wins should be awarded in my opinion. and not the player sitting there hoping thr person above him lose to hi person above.
If that was the case though, then in theory, someone could wait until the final day of the league to play and go from outside the ladder all the way to first which is not fair to the other players who played all season. Also, I did not mean you specifically would challenge someone over and over. I just used you as an example. You may not but there are plenty of players who would.
Why not ? where is the difference between who made 10 games in 100 day to get first and who make 10 game in 10 day and get first... i think the second deserve more he had less time and he need to be succesful .... and if the player 10/100 deserve first place he can stop the other who can try to make fast climb like he did with others. Just saying
I k i dont ask over and over again ... and none can lets make and example
1st place
2nd place
3d place
Now lets say 3d challenge 2nd and lose , he cant reask to second to rechallenge him over and over again.... lets say 3d win and 1st player is online 1st player is obligated to answer and accept 3d challenge .
Following your rule this can happen : 3d win to 2nd , 1st not accept challenge to 3d cos he had already played ... next day 2d challenge 3d to retake the place and win , 1st doenst accept the challenge cos 2d have already play .... So the 1st can stay there and sit seeing 3d and 2nd changing their places .